|
Chess Scotland Noticeboard A place for chess nuts to boast over an open forum
|
Important Notice:
We regret to inform you that our free phpBB forum hosting service will be discontinued by the end of June 30, 2024.
If you wish to migrate to our paid hosting service, please contact billing@hostonnet.com.
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Alex Ian Rook
Joined: 31 Jan 2007 Posts: 51 Location: EK
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 8:26 pm Post subject: 30 games |
|
|
hi, I have a question...
When you have played 30 games, your gain for winning is decreased. I would really just like to know why this is the case, as this does not allow players who play continously to go up very much.
Thanks, Alex Ian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Robert Lothian King
Joined: 16 Feb 2007 Posts: 162 Location: Veterinarian's Hospital
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 6:06 pm Post subject: Getting bored explaining this one repeatedly |
|
|
The point is that your grade is an average. All of your games add up to a value of 800 points. So one game is worth 800 pts, 2 games would be worth 400 each and so on. But it would be ridiculous to have an 800 point difference on the basis of one game. So the minimum number of games is set to 30. As a result, value per game is constant until 30 games.
In other words, it's not people who play more than 30 games who are being penalised (actually stabilised - it works both ways), it's people who play less than 30.
There's some funny psychology in operation that causes people to extrapolate the straight line and convince themselves that that's the unmodified ('correct') function. It's the 1/N curve that should be extrapolated back to the singularity at zero games. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ian McLachlan Rook
Joined: 31 Jan 2007 Posts: 63 Location: Lanark
|
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 11:39 am Post subject: Re: Getting bored explaining this one repeatedly |
|
|
Doctor Bob wrote: |
There's some funny psychology in operation that causes people to extrapolate the straight line and convince themselves that that's the unmodified ('correct') function. It's the 1/N curve that should be extrapolated back to the singularity at zero games. |
I was just about to say exactly the same thing! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|